Don’t count the numbers, count the spoons
The bigger a study, the better? That’s an assumption often made. But even studies that knock us out by their sheer size may be wrong.
Sheila Bird and Clive Fairweather :: Wed 28th Jul 2010
Sheila Bird :: Tue 20th Jul 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Tue 20th Jul 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Fri 16th Jul 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 15th Jul 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Wed 14th Jul 2010
Wed 26th May 2010
Mon 22nd Feb 2010
Thu 18th Feb 2010
The bigger a study, the better? That’s an assumption often made. But even studies that knock us out by their sheer size may be wrong.
Controversy over the effectiveness of antidepressants such as Prozac, provoked by an article by Irving Kirsch and colleagues in 2008 in PLOS Medicine, shows no sign of declining.
The most striking revelation in a quarter of comments in BMJ.com on the Department of Health’s risk sharing scheme for multiple sclerosis (MS) drugs is its undermining of subseq
The new Government has promised to establish a system in which the price paid for drugs represents the value they bring to patients.
Is David Cameron right to claim that people are dying because they cannot get access to cancer drugs?
Seven years ago, after strong media, clinical and patient pressure, the Government negotiated a “risk-sharing” deal over access to drugs to treat multiple sclerosis.
The NHS Information Centre has issued some “experimental statistics” covering the take-up of medicines approved by the National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).