China: steering by guesswork?
Political leaders who struggled with the Depression of the 1930s worked blind: they had no GDP measure, but managed as best they could on figures of the freight being carried by the railways, stock market prices, and a few industry indices.
Things are better now, of course. Except, maybe, in China, where nobody believes the official statistics, including the man tipped to take over as China’s Premier next March, Li Keqiang (pictured). In 2007, the Financial Times reports today, he told the US Ambassador that Chinese data was “man-made” and therefore unreliable. He used them “for reference only”, he added.
Instead, he relied upon electricity consumption, rail cargo volumes, and disbursement of bank loans to evaluate economic growth. Shades of the 1930s!
Why this might matter is that while China’s official GDP data is showing a growth rate of 8.1 per cent from the first quarter of 2011 to the equivalent period this year, Mr Li’s favourite measures are looking far less rosy. Electricity consumption rose just 0.7 per cent between March 2011 and March 2012, while rail cargo volumes are increasing at about half the rate they were last year, and banks extended fewer loans than expected.
So China’s economy may be slowing far more dramatically than the official figures make it seem. Running a massive economy on such shaky numbers is an accident waiting to happen. China’s government has been trying to slow the property boom which has left the more prosperous parts of the country littered with empty apartment blocks. In doing so, the FT’s Jamil Anderlini suggests, it may have been more successful than it yet realises.

Stew Green (not verified) wrote,
Tue, 15/05/2012 - 17:33
* bears * woods
- Surely everyone knows that statistics out of countries where "face" is more important than truth are not reliable ... this is most of the world including virtually every country in Asia ..Argentinian inflation figures for example. (British newspapers have a problem with truth though)
RCottrell (not verified) wrote,
Mon, 21/05/2012 - 14:19
Having been part of the official data collection process on which UK GDP is based I am not so confident that the figures are much more reliabel than the Chinese ones. It was clear that the official to whom I spoke to clarify how to complete the form stating my organisations income per month and "grants recieved" (hu?) merely wished to get some figures. He had no interest whatever in whether then information I supplied was accurate, still less meaningful. Multiply the errors in my return (the form was simply inappropriate for an organisation that gets 90% of its annual income in January) by a million of so other forms and the resulting GDP estimate will be as reliable as Krushkev's for the Soviet Union. Presmably China suffers from the charactersitic failing of authoritarian centrally run economies - no one dares tell the truth. We suffer merely from delusions of competence in the Civil Service.
Sumit Rahman (not verified) wrote,
Thu, 24/05/2012 - 08:53
RCottrell presumably not all of the "million or so" forms are going to firms like yours that get 90% of their income in January?
Post new comment