Spurious accuracy seduces journalists time and time again
An insidious abuse of statistics is spurious accuracy.
Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 2nd Sep 2010
Robert Whiston and Nigel Hawkes :: Thu 2nd Sep 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Tue 31st Aug 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Tue 17th Aug 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Mon 16th Aug 2010
Nigel Hawkes :: Mon 16th Aug 2010
Thu 5th Aug 2010
Wed 26th May 2010
Mon 22nd Feb 2010
An insidious abuse of statistics is spurious accuracy.
Polly Toynbee claims in her Guardian column today that the cost of the cur
“Rise of the high-flying wives who leave hubby in the home” wrote the Daily Mail.
Wild excitement must have gripped readers of The Guardian on Saturday, when they read on Page 1 of the sports section that Manchester United was valued at a mere £800,000,
The Guardian has an entertaining story today about the number of bugs in Britain's soil. Apparently they've doubled in number in the past decade.
In today’s Guardian, Professor David Salisbury, Director of Immunisation at the Department of Health, is quoted as saying that H1N1 vaccine is completely safe for pregnant women.
In Saturday’s Guardian, Ben Goldacre dismembered a Home Office study designed to evaluate a drug education project in schools.
The complaint made by Straight Statistics reader John Huggins to the Press Complaints Commission against The Guardian has been rejected.
A Straight Statistics reader, John Huggins, has taken exception to a graphic in The Guardian, illustrating the rise in youth unemployment.
“Don’t give your children ham” says the World Cancer Research Fund today, claiming that 3,700 cases of bowel cancer a year could be prevented in the UK if everyone ate less than 70g of processed meat a week.